Tulane Accepts Convicted Murderer Into its Class of 2014From September 14, 2011:
http://abovethelaw.com/2011/09/new-tulane-1l-is-an-advocate-a-writer-and-a-murderer/
“Most of you have probably never heard of Charles Russell, but he was a professor at the Community College of Rhode Island who was murdered in 1992. His attacker served 12 years in prison and admits his guilt.
The man who killed Professor Russell is named Bruce Reilly. After serving his time, Reilly turned his life around and became an advocate for criminal rights and prisoners’ rights. He worked for a group called DARE – Direct Action for Rights and Equality. He is respected by colleagues. He has testified before the Rhode Island statehouse with the credibility of an expert. He wrote an award-winning screenplay. And after a lot of work, he was accepted into the Tulane Law School for the class of 2014.” [Emphasis mine]
http://restoringdignitytothelaw.blogspot.com/2011/09/on-tulanes-murderer-1l.html
“They gave him an institutional scholarship, too. Apparently U.S. News doesn't factor in felonies.”
J-Dog received one angry, incoherent comment, on that September 16th entry. Based on the tone of his correspondence with Elie Mystal, I wouldn’t be surprised if that remark was posted by Reilly. Recall this story from January 13, 2011:
Ohio Bar Applicant Denied Entry Due to Crippling Student Debt
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/law_grad_with_no_plan_to_repay_debt_fails_character_and_fitness_mandate_ohi
“Ohio State University law grad Hassan Jonathan Griffin of Columbus, Ohio, has a part-time job in the public defender’s office and no feasible plan to repay his law-school and credit-card debt.
That combination means Griffin has so far failed to satisfy the character and fitness qualification to get a law license, the Ohio Supreme Court has ruled. The opinion (PDF) upholds a recommendation by the Supreme Court’s Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness.
Griffin had $170,000 in student-loan debt and $16,500 in credit-card debt. He earns $12 an hour at his part-time job with the PD.” [Emphasis mine]
If a debt-strapped law grad cannot sit for the bar exam, due to “character and fitness” issues related to his monstrous student debt, how in the hell is a convicted murderer going to qualify?!?! I recognize that this is a different state. However, it is irresponsible for an ABA-accredited law school to accept such a student. I am certain that the commode cautioned Reilly, prior to his enrollment, that he “may not be able to sit for a bar exam.” (I suspect that, Reilly did not warn his victim, Charles Russell.)
American Bar Association’s Standards on Admissions and Student Services
http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/legaled/standards/20082009StandardsWebContent/Chapter_5.authcheckdam.pdf
“Standard 501. ADMISSIONS
(b) a law school shall not admit applicants who do not appear capable of satisfactorily completing its educational program and being admitted to the bar.” [Emphasis in original]
The again, the ABA does not even take its own “Standards” seriously. Do the bitches and hags even look at these guidelines?!?! Let’s head to the character and fitness standard, anyway.
“Standard 504. CHARACTER AND FITNESS
(a ) A law school shall advise each applicant that there are character, fitness and other qualifications for admission to the bar and encourage the applicant, prior to matriculation, to determine what those requirements are in the state(s) in which the applicant intends to practice. The law school should, as soon after matriculation as is practicable, take additional steps to apprise entering students of the importance of determining the applicable character, fitness and other qualifications.” [Emphasis in original]
For $ome rea$on, the ABA does not require the commodes to take additional steps PRIOR to matriculation. Hell, look at the pathetic language employed, i.e. “The law school should, as soon after matriculation…”
http://qfora.com/jdu/thread.php?threadId=20469#post289426
By the way, if you want to cry and wail, i.e. “You’re being unfair to this guy, who turned his life around,” then leave this site. Look at this JDU thread. The general consensus is that the school is being irresponsible to Reilly, taxpayers, and the public. Do you think that his institutional scholarship – and NAACP funds – will cover all of his tuition and living expenses?!?!
http://www.law.tulane.edu/tlsadmissions/index.aspx?id=200
Keep in mind that full-time tuition and fees, at Tulane Law – for the 2011-2012 school year – amount to $43,684!!
http://www.courts.ri.gov/Courts/SuperiorCourt/DecisionsOrders/02-0059.pdf
On the positive side, Reilly has a hell of a lot more experience drafting pleadings than the rest of the class combined.
Conclusion: Honestly, I don’t care whether Bruce Reilly is rehabilitated or not. It is clear that he wants to use his degree to help a class of people, who have violated the rights/ended the lives of others. If he is unable to sit for a bar exam, I suppose that Tulane University Law Sewer will tell him, “It’s your fault for not performing your due diligence, and for relying on our word.” In this particular situation, the greedy pigs may use a friendlier tone.







